CEP 800 Final Reflection
I teach 24 third grade students. They are learning to be creative writers by using the Writing Workshop model. This model consists of five stages: prewriting, drafting, revision, editing, and finally publishing. This teaching model fits well with my beliefs about pedagogy. I appreciate activities where students work at their own level, but are able to learn from each other to find solutions to problems. The writers workshop model is very constructivist in nature as it provides for a great deal of cooperative group and partner work. Teachers function as coaches by leading mini lessons and by holding individual conferences with students to guide them as they work to discover their own strengths and weaknesses as writers. My students had already learned about where writers get ideas and had been collecting story ideas for several weeks. They were ready to move on to the next stage of the process, revision. My lesson plan focused on the revision process in the Writing Workshop. I also believe that technology can be used to enhance the teaching and learning process and was interested in how it might work for Writing Workshop. I decided to add a new technology component to my writing workshop, the use of Flipvideo cameras. I began creating the lesson by considering my essential questions and several of the Michigan Grade Level Content Expectations for Writing Process guided the lesson. My big idea questions included:
1. What strategies do good writers use?
2. How can the writing process help me to be a better writer?
3. What are the steps in the writing process?
4. Why is revising my work important?
5. How can I use the writing traits to improve my writing?
This lesson was actually adapted from several mini lessons to include a technology portion and to include student self reflection and assessment using the Six Traits of writing. The Six Traits of writing is a common assessment tool used to improve writing. The traits have been identified as the elements that make up “good” writing. The majority of the lesson used social constructivist strategies. Students spent a great deal of time conferring with writing partners and giving each other feedback. I spent time guiding students and coaching them on how to use cameras both individually and in small groups. I had to instruct them on major functions such as the on/off button, play, delete, and how to flip back and forth from one video to another. There was a great deal of active engagement throughout the lesson. Social constructivist activities drive most of my lessons and the use of buddies for writing encourages collaboration and creative thinking. I taught several mini lessons on becoming better storytellers and learning to revise writing to make it even better. Following the lessons, students used FlipVideo cameras to record themselves and their writing partners. Then they watched themselves and commented on each other’s work as well as their own. The purpose of using this technology was for students to both see and hear themselves as storytellers. We also discussed how using technology, such as the Flipvideo camera, could help them improve their writing by allowing them to see themselves as “real” storytellers. I reinforced this point during individual conferences throughout the lesson. Much of the lesson included reflective activities to encourage metacognition and to encourage student creativity. I hoped that if they could hear and see themselves in the act of storytelling, they would identify strengths and weaknesses in their writing. We also watched other famous storytellers on videos or online and it was fun to watch my students attempt to imitate the mentor authors. Using technology in the writing process is a new way to spark student learning. This seemed to inspire them to take steps in revising their work. The final culmination was when they watched themselves in a classroom video production following completion of their final drafts. They graded themselves using a rubric that used “kid friendly” language. I expected that each student would be able to grade themselves using the rubric and be able to explain the positives of their story and mention a few goals for their next piece. I found that students were harder on themselves than I would have been! They were very quick to point out areas where they had done well, but they were honest to find areas where they would try to do even better on their next story.
One constraint was the fact that I only had six cameras so I could only have half the class working on this at a time. I had the other half work on writing in their notebooks during that time and then we switched. No one seemed to be upset by this and it worked out well. The actual filming and peer conferencing only took about 15 minutes. Students found immediate success using the cameras and became experts in no time. I spent a very minimal amount of time working with small groups to teach them the basic functions of the cameras, including on/off, play, record and delete. I also showed them the zoom feature and how to adjust the audio levels. They had bit of trouble holding the cameras still and this made some of them harder to watch than others. I might purchase tripods in the future or suggest that kids rest their arms on a table while filming. Noise in the room was not an issue. The cameras seem to record what is closest and so as long as the room was fairly quiet, background noise wasn’t a problem. I allowed kids to film in the hallways for their final drafts and this made them even better. I might take more time in the future to have kids make a simple backdrop for their videos. This would be very nice for the final copies after they complete the editing stage in the process. Not only would their papers be picture perfect for publishing, but so would their videos! This is an idea for my next lesson as I plan to continue with the cameras all year for Writing Workshop.
My third grade students loved this project. I have taught it before but have never adapted the lesson to this degree. There were many affordances during this lesson. Incorporating technology seemed to add an element of excitement and motivated hard to motivate students in a way that I hadn’t really expected. I had students who usually have melt downs during writing beg to write! They wanted to use the cameras so they knew they had to be ready to film. This meant having some idea of what they wanted to tell. They worked harder on rewriting their work so that they would have more of a story to tell, thus have a longer video! Students were eager to work and to write after the activities. They were able to describe what the revision process meant and what strategies authors might use to revise their work. This became evident when we were reading other books outside of writers’ workshop and students made comments about the author’s craft. Comments included, “He uses lots of details,”; “She began the chapter with dialogue.”; “I am excited to read more because the author is giving me so many details and I don’t need any pictures.” I was really pleased with how well the lesson turned out. It was also helpful to have taught the lesson before without any modifications or implementation of technology. I had always thought the lesson was very thorough as I had taught it previously, but when I took extra time to think about “thinking” and “learning” I was able to modify it to meet the needs of more of my students and to really incorporate the technology component. The main modification I made for students with writing disabilities was to scribe for them as we watched their video together. This was very beneficial because we could play the video back and continue to make changes as we went along in the actual writing.
In summary, I was very pleased with the outcome of my lesson. I learned a lot and so did my students. I learned to really think about why I am teaching something. I also discovered how letting standards and essential questions guide my teaching is very helpful. I was so aware of teaching and learning. I made an effort to include constructivist activities and opportunities for self evaluation and peer feedback. I hoped that this would trigger metacognition. I wanted my students to see themselves as writers and storytellers. I wanted them to see that they could make their “good” writing “great” writing and that this didn’t mean they had not done a bad job the first time, but they had done an amazing job with work and reflection. As I think back to my adventure in CEP 800 and what I’ve learned about learning, I can see where thinking about how my students would learn and what I could do to enhance the lessons really paid off. The added technology component was essential in the learning process in that it really took students to a new level in self reflection. I could see where this group of students was getting more out of the lesson than previous classes. I was also reminded that lessons can and should be modified and adapted to fit my needs and the needs of all of my students. Incorporating technology is just one way to add excitement and to encourage creativity. Technology can add an additional piece to the learning process. Students crave technology. When teachers can use it, they should use it. We must find ways to captivate our students. Using Flipvideo cameras was a new way to do this. Students loved being filmed as much as they loved being behind the cameras. I have several teachers begging me to show them how to use the cameras and asking for the lesson!



